![\"USA-FISCAL-DEFENSE\"](\"http:\/\/www.cass-ro.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/05\/2013-04-10T180129Z_55924180_GM1E94B05II01_RTRMADP_3_USA-FISCAL-DEFENSE-300x198.jpg\")
Wilton Park, England:\u00a0 Here at a conference on Professional Military Education, attention is being focused on one small sliver of the largest challenge facing militaries in general and Western forces in particular:\u00a0 people.\u00a0 While John Paul Jones may be less popular in these isles than across the Atlantic, paraphrasing one of his better bon mots captures this perplexing challenge:\u00a0 \u201cPeople are more important than guns in the rating of a ship.\u201d<\/p>\n
Over the next year and led by the Strategic Choices Review undertaken by the Pentagon and to be finished by month\u2019s end, the latest Quadrennial Defense Review will be conducted.\u00a0 The mega-challenges are clear.\u00a0 Regardless of the effect of sequestration, the defense budget will contract.\u00a0 The only question is how much.<\/p>\n
Inbuilt cost growth of astounding proportion for both people and equipment will mandate huge program changes even if defense spending were to remain constant—which it will not.\u00a0 Simultaneous modernization of strategic, naval, air and ground systems creates further tectonic pressures on where to set priorities and where not.\u00a0 And to make matters worse, massive regulatory burdens and Congressional micromanagement compound inefficiencies and multiply obstacles in taking rational and sensible decisions over using already scarce and strained resources.<\/p>\n
Yet, while everyone pays lip service to the importance of people, without fundamental changes to personnel policies, will the United States be able to maintain capable, motivated, agile, prepared and professional forces essential to protecting the nation\u2019s security into the future?\u00a0 This warning does not suggest military and civilian Pentagon leadership is unaware of the seriousness of this issue.\u00a0 It does mean that without real revolutions in how we resolve these personnel challenges, warnings of a 21st<\/sup> century variant of the infamous \u201chollow force\u201d will sadly prove prescient.<\/p>\n Twelve years of war have had and will have profound effect on the forces particularly those having served multiple tours at war even though a minority of people in uniform has actually spent much time in combat.\u00a0 No sector in American society is held in higher esteem than the military.\u00a0 \u201cThank you for your service,\u201d is as common an expression today in America for people in uniform as is hello.<\/p>\n Service personnel rightfully believe that they are protecting the nation.\u00a0 They are highly skilled; dedicated; armed with the best weapons and technology available; and believe in what they are doing.\u00a0 Virtually no expense has been spared in providing them the wherewithal to carry out their duties including importing American institutions such as PX\u2019s, latest movies and fast food chains to forward operating bases.\u00a0 We even send bottled war at $800 a gallon to front line troops and have spent $70 billion in countering improvised explosive devices to protect our people in uniform.<\/p>\n For those who have served in combat, responsibilities are heavy as is the rush of adrenalin when in action and bullets are flying.\u00a0 Even junior enlisted personnel often have responsibilities far greater than their rank suggests.\u00a0 And however dangerous, many fighting men and women are attracted to this line of work.<\/p>\n As the war in Iraq is over and the drawdown from Afghanistan takes hold, fewer Americans will be sent in harm\u2019s way, assuming that another conflict does not erupt.\u00a0 So what then do our forces have to look forward to in peacetime and will those duties be so routine, onerous and uninteresting as to make retaining a highly professional force difficult or impossible?\u00a0 And there is the matter of ethics and even morality.<\/p>\n Most of our operations on the ground have been \u201ccapture or kill\u201d missions reinforced by the ability to bring direct and indirect fires to bear and to rely in many cases on drones and standoff attacks.\u00a0 The line between this form of war and assassination is quite fine. Laws of war, more or less well developed in battle between like conventional forces, do not preclude atrocities or excesses.\u00a0 However, over centuries, unlike current conflicts, laws of war have precedence and a certain legitimacy in international law.<\/p>\n Consider the staff sergeant or lieutenant back from the wars where perhaps responsibility for protecting or governing a town, village or large area was theirs.\u00a0 In many cases, life or death decisions were common.\u00a0 Yet, in peacetime, these same non-coms and officers will be evaluated as to how well they fill out duty rosters to provide troops for menial tasks or guard duty while budgets will erode training and honing professional skills.<\/p>\n Solutions to resolve this people crisis about what is the number one priority for defense abound PROVIDING the nation\u2019s leadership recognizes and chooses to act on this understanding.\u00a0 The senior military leadership is able and prepared to create these solutions.\u00a0 But policy must allow them to do so.\u00a0 And revolutionary ideas are more than welcome and needed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Wilton Park, England:\u00a0 Here at a conference on Professional Military Education, attention is being focused on one small sliver of the largest challenge facing militaries in general and Western forces in particular:\u00a0 people.\u00a0 While John Paul Jones may be less popular in these isles than across the Atlantic, paraphrasing one of his better bon mots captures this perplexing challenge:\u00a0 \u201cPeople are more important than guns in the rating of a ship.\u201d Over the next year and led by the Strategic Choices Review undertaken by the Pentagon and to be finished by month\u2019s end, the latest Quadrennial Defense Review will be conducted.\u00a0 The mega-challenges are clear.\u00a0 Regardless of the effect of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":2389,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[101],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2396","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cass-ro.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2396"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cass-ro.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cass-ro.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cass-ro.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cass-ro.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2396"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cass-ro.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2396\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3004,"href":"https:\/\/www.cass-ro.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2396\/revisions\/3004"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cass-ro.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2389"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cass-ro.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2396"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cass-ro.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2396"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cass-ro.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2396"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}